Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:24

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Carbon capture method mines cement ingredients from the air - Tech Xplore
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Bitcoin: Despite 10% retail dip, whales could lead BTC to $111K – How? - AMBCrypto
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Quia quia unde harum qui quas.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What can you do if someone makes a false accusation against you?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Air India plane crash: Investigation underway, black boxes found - ABC News
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.